August Unemployment Up in 26 States. But BLS shows Rope-a-Dope AGAIN (updated)
September 21, 2012
Last May, I reported that the “States most likely to REJECT austerity to lower unemployment are Republican”, which surprised me, because I started my investigation expecting to find that Republican governors were laying off a massive number of public sector workers out of a Zealot-like belief in “Austerity”. What I found instead was shocking (well, not really. GOP-hypocrisy doesn’t shock me anymore): While publicly condemning growth in the size of Government, Republican governors in Red states were the MOST likely to EXPAND the public sector workforce by hiring tens-of-thousands of new government employees to bring down their own state’s unemployment. Most conspicuous was Texas Governor Rick Perry, whose state’s low unemployment was dubbed “The Texas Miracle”. So when I learned Friday that the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) announced a preliminary report showing that Unemployment rose in 26 States in August, I thought my original suspicion would finally be confirmed: that Red State governors were laying off public-sector workers en masse to hurt President Obama in November, but instead, I found further confirmation of my initial report last May showing that Republican governors are actually the ones doing the most government-hiring (I’ll leave it to you to reason why).
So I went to the BLS looking for that list of “26 states”, and while they linked to their report on their homepage, it doesn’t actually list the “26 states” specifically, but instead lists states with the “greatest change in employment” over the past month vs one year ago.
“Table C” of the BLS Report (ibid) lists just 14 states with the largest change in net “employment” (combined private/public):
Statistically significant employment changes from July'12 to August'12, seasonally adjusted (Emphasis mine). -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | July | August | Over-the-month State | 2012 | 2012(p) | change(p) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Connecticut...................| 1,631,600 | 1,624,800 | -6,800 Delaware......................| 417,100 | 415,100 | -2,000 District of Columbia..........| 738,600 | 727,400 | -11,200 Florida.......................| 7,325,100 | 7,348,300 | 23,200 Hawaii........................| 598,500 | 602,600 | 4,100 Idaho.........................| 612,700 | 616,600 | 3,900 Missouri......................| 2,639,800 | 2,657,700 | 17,900 New Mexico....................| 798,200 | 792,300 | -5,900 Oklahoma......................| 1,588,000 | 1,598,400 | 10,400 Oregon........................| 1,634,400 | 1,643,200 | 8,800 | | | Texas.........................| 10,807,600 | 10,845,600 | 38,000 Vermont.......................| 305,600 | 303,200 | -2,400 Virginia......................| 3,723,800 | 3,711,400 | -12,400 Washington....................| 2,880,200 | 2,871,400 | -8,800 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- p = preliminary.
Four states jump out right away: Florida, Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas, all showing job growth GROWTH in the double digits while most other states show job losses in the thousands. My curiosity piqued, I decided to see just where that “job growth” took place:
Private sector employment by state in thousands (color denotes Governor's party): July 2012 Aug 2012 net loss/gain Florida.............. 9,271.2 9,261.2 -10.0 Missouri............. 2,998.1 2,987.2 -10.9 Oklahoma............. 1,795.7 1,798.9 +3.2 Texas................ 12,642.2 12,628.9 -13.3
The only one of those four states to actually show growth in private sector employment was Oklahoma, which saw just over 3,000 jobs created in August. Yet look at “Table C” again. Each state showed positive job growth well over ten-thousand (even in the tens of thousands). Those jobs could ONLY have come from hiring in the public sector:
Change in PUBLIC sector hiring (in thousands): #chg in #net jobs #gov jobs UE rate: UE rate: private jobs added added July August Florida........... -10.0 23.2 +33.2 8.8 8.8 Missouri.......... -10.9 17.9 +7.9 7.2 7.2 Oklahoma.......... +3.2 10.4 +7.2 4.9 5.1 Texas............. -13.3 38.0 +51.0 7.1 7.1
THIRTY-THREE THOUSAND public-sector jobs added in Florida. FIFTY-ONE THOUSAND public-sector jobs added in Texas. And in all four states, this massive hiring was necessary just to maintain the status quo (Oklahoma, whose UE rate ticked up, also hired the fewest public sector workers in our group).
Meanwhile, nationally, the unemployment rate is stuck stubbornly above 8-percent because if the Federal government did what the deep-red states of Texas & Florida are doing to keep their unemployment rates low, The Right in this country would howl like a coyote bays at the moon over President Obama’s “fiscal irresponsibility”.
I’m just sayin’.
(UPDATE: It bears noting that of the remaining 24 states, 12 saw their unemployment rate go down and 12 saw their rate stay the same. The rate fell in 42 states (plus DC) vs one year ago (rates rose in 7 states, and stayed the same in 1). The National Unemployment Rate fell a full point vs 1 year ago.)
Be sure to add “MugsysRapSheet” to your Twitter feed. And don’t forget our updated (and fixed) “Must See Videos” page.)
Writers Wanted Got something to say? Mugsy’s Rap Sheet is always looking for article submissions to focus on the stories we may miss each week. To volunteer your own Op/Ed for inclusion here, send us an email with an example of your writing skills & choice of topic, and maybe we’ll put you online! |
||
|
||
Please REGISTER to be notified by e-mail every time this Blog is updated! Firefox/IE users can use RSS for a browser link that lists the latest posts! |
September 21, 2012
· Admin Mugsy · 2 Comments - Add
Posted in: Economy, Election, Jobs
2 Responses
chiropractor queens - October 10, 2012
I tend not to write many responses, however i did
a few searching and wound up here August Unemployment Up in 26 States.
But BLS shows Rope-a-Dope AGAIN (updated) ? Mugsy`s Rap Sheet.
And I do have a couple of questions for you if you tend not to mind.
Could it be simply me or does it look as if
like a few of the responses appear like left by brain dead folks?
😛 And, if you are posting at other online social sites,
I would like to keep up with anything fresh you have to post.
Could you make a list of the complete urls of all your social sites like your twitter feed, Facebook page or linkedin profile?
Mugsy - October 10, 2012
Hi CQ,
Since your reply was the first and only response to this post, if the replies appear to be left by “brain dead folks”, you’re not leaving me much room to disagree.
Regarding “Social Sites”, see the links to our Facebook page and Twitter feed in the right-hand column.
Leave a Reply